A phishing site tricks people into voluntarily handing over personal information-like credit card numbers-by impersonating a legitimate website. That's especially disappointing because phishing attacks can do a lot of damage to victims, and they don't require a lot of technical sophistication on the part of attackers. In those tests, Kaspersky and McAfee blocked 100 percent of the phishing sites. That's particularly bad compared to the 89 and 90 percent blocked by Firefox and Chrome. Rubenking found that the SmartScreen filter in Edge blocked just 68 percent of phishing sites, for example. You could chalk that up to decades of name recognition for competitors, but testing has revealed some notable shortcomings in Windows Defender. Now, Defender hasn't totally stolen the spotlight away from the McAfees and the Bitdefenders of the world. In his review, my colleague Neil Rubenking found that Microsoft's offering did an excellent job detecting and preventing malicious software. But it improved over time, so much so that it started to snag top scores from independent lab assessments.
When Microsoft's security offering first went under the microscope, it didn't impress. It costs them nothing and doesn't require them to take any action. With this software, Microsoft ensured that customers would have some kind of protection from the moment they first booted up their computer.
Is Windows Defender Any Good?įor those who are unaware, Microsoft Security Essentials was antivirus software included by Microsoft with Windows starting in 2009, until it was supplanted by Microsoft Windows Defender Security Center. But the longer answer is that it could do better-and you can still do better with third-party antivirus. The short answer is that the bundled security solution from Microsoft is pretty good at most things. Are you suggesting that Microsoft Security Essentials on Windows 10 is not sufficient? You recommend third-party anti-malware, McAfee, Bitdefender, and Kaspersky in one of your articles.
0 kommentar(er)
